Reasons you don’t need to worry about British Cycling

April 29, 2016 at 3:10 pm | Posted in cycling | 4 Comments
Tags: , , ,

Worried about what’s happening at British Cycling? Concerned that recent revelations indicate it’s a fundamentally sick institution rife with sexism, racism and ableism? Relax! I’m here to explain why you can carry on cheering and waving flags and just generally LOVING how totally brilliant we are at everything.

British-Union-Jack-Flag

Marvellous

1. Nobody ever complained about anything at BC before now, so everything must have been fine.
2. Well, apart from that review in 2012.
3. Nobody changed anything after the 2012 report, though, so it can’t have found out anything that important.
4. Oh, yeah, there was that book in 2012, too. But, well, she was never a team player. You know.
5. All the people who’ve complained about their treatment have chips on their shoulders because they didn’t get picked for stuff.
6. Well, okay, some of them got picked for stuff. But all the other people who’ve complained are well-known for crying a lot.
7. Well, all the women are well-known for crying a lot.
8. Top-level sportswomen cry at, like, EVERYTHING. They’re just bags of nerves. Honestly.
9. Okay, only some of the women are well-known for crying a lot. Maybe only one. Whatever. You get my drift.
10. Women have REALLY good imaginations. They’re always imagining stuff like sexism, when all anyone was doing was commenting on their arse in a totally supportive way and calling them ‘man one’ because, well, what, hang on, you mean there’s a WOMEN’S team sprint? Gosh.
11. No men have reported sexist comments being made about them, so there can’t have been any.
12. Lots of able-bodied athletes have said nobody ever called them ‘wobblies’ or ‘gimps’, so the others are obviously imagining it.
13. Lots of high-profile men have said everyone was always totally lovely to them, and they’re the REALLY successful athletes – you know, the PROPER ones that get lots of funding and everything – so we should listen to them.
14.None of the men said anyone told them they should go and have a baby. If anyone said it to a woman, he was probably just concerned about her making the right choices. Women always appreciate help with that.
15. No white athletes have ever been called ‘dirty terrorists’, so that must have been just banter. Where would we be without banter? What do you mean, in a more equitable and tolerant society?
16. Everyone at BC is always nice to their old mum.
17. Anyway that bloke’s resigned now, hasn’t he, so it’s all fine. Phew. Carry on!

4 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. due a signed ‘non disclosure agreement’, I only found out after the death of a very good friend who used to be a physio at BC that the reason she left around 10-12 years ago was that she had been fired by a man who now has a knighthood as she had dared to be pregnant and then had to be paid off to keep quiet to be fair, they apparently also treated men badly too if they were not important athletes, e.g. the mechanics. we need a new phrase that encompasses quite a lot of categories of discrimination, maybe they are everyone-who-isn’t-a-(probably hetero)-male-elite-athlete-ist?

  2. Come on, be fair! Like taking performance-enhancing drugs, it’s all been an administrative error. P.S. Check my eBay site for state-of-the-art bikes at low low prices!

  3. […] the run-up to the Olympics/Paralympic Games. Before you go, why not read Accident Bizarro’s Reasons You Don’t Need to Worry about British Cycling and think about these two pictures […]


Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.